Thursday, January 29, 2009

Consolidation


Note to my readers: From this point forward, except for blogs still in the embryo stage, all my blog posts will be consolidated here in "This Week's Chess Safari." I will add a comprehensive index as soon as it is practicable (by mid-year at the latest!). Thank you for your interest. I appreciate it very much!


Frank, Frannie and the "crew"

Thursday, January 22, 2009

My dog ate my....what?

This was my favorite post from my now-defunct blog, "Frannie the Racing Greyhound."

Jonathon Papelbon's dog who ate his World Series baseball hasn't got anything on my friend Buddy, the black lab from Arizona.

Read more here.

Or, you can go here.

As one poster out there in cyberspace commented: for once you can actually blame the messenger!

You go, Buddy

Frannie

Originally posted 2/1/08.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Greyhounds watching greyhounds

"For something a lttle bit different...

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Relentless King Hunt

I have been intrigued by GM Adorjan’s 10…Nf5! line in the B96 Najdorf Sicilian ever since I saw it in New In Chess Yearbook about 10 years ago.

Earlier today, a friend gave me a chance to play the line. Previously (1999) a CCLA correspondence opponent responded with 11. g3 and I won easily after 11…Nxh4 12. gxh4 Qxf6. This time I faced 11.Bxg7.

J.Peterson vs. F.Niro, Boise Idaho, November 28, 2008

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Nc6 8. e5 h6 9. Bh4 Nxd4 10. exf6 (more popular is 10.Qxd4) 10…Nf5! (Adorjan’s line) 11. fxg7 Qxh4+ 12. g3 Nxg3 13. gxh8(Q) Ne4+! (this is as far as I remembered from earlier study) 14. Ke2 Qf2+ 15. Kd3 Nc5+ 16. Kc4 b5+ 17. Nxb5 axb5+ 18. Kc3 b4+ 19. Kc4 d5+ 20. Kxb4 Ra4+ 21. Kb5 Bd7+ 22. Kb6 Nd3+ 23. Kc7 Qa7# (0-1)

Can you see where White might have improved his play after Adorjan’s 10…Nf5! ?

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Family Tree

My mother, Frances Flaherty Niro (1927-1988), high school graduation photo taken in 1944

I will utilize this blog post to accumulate geneology information concerning my ancestors. This will be an ongoing process and take some time to complete -- if it could ever be complete...

Starting with the oldest line first:

(Tufts/Fowle)

1 Thomas Tufts b. 1505 Norfolk, England
2 Peter Tufts (1538-1580) Gissing Norfolk, England
3 James Tufts (1564-1625) South Lopham, England
4 Peter Tuffs (1589-??) Norfolk, England
5 Mary Tuffs Fowle (1613-1676) m. George Fowle (abt1610-1682) and emigrated from Kent, England (map) to America in 1638, Charlestown, MA
6 James Fowle (1643-1690) Woburn, MA
7 James Fowle (1667-1714) Woburn, MA
8 Samuel Fowle (1705-1793) Woburn, MA
9 Joshua Fowle (1733-1779) Woburn, MA
10 Samuel Fowles (1764/5-1847) Whitefield, ME
11 Asa Fowles (1790-1870) Searsmont, ME
12 Samuel Fowles (1821-1887) Searsmont, ME
13 William Loren (Lowring) Fowles (1851-1929) Searsmont, ME (ma. Nellie Ladd, July 13, 1876 -- see Ladd line listed below)
14 Burton Fowles (1881-1958) Belfast, ME
15 Alberta Fowles Flaherty (1907-1973) Milford, MA
16 Frances Flaherty Niro (1927-1988) Milford, MA
17 Francis (Frank) Niro b. 1948

Sources: Descendants of George Fowle (1610/11?-1682) of Charlestown, Massachusetts, Compiled by Eugene Chalmers Fowle (NEHGS Boston 1990) and Irving-fam com (click link to see start of tree)

Gravesite of my Great Grandparents in Belfast, Maine
My maternal grandmother Alberta Fowles Flaherty (1907-1973) Draper Park, Milford, MA 1941
House in Belfast, ME where my maternal grandmaother, Alberta Fowles Flaherty, once lived (as it looked in 1989)
My Great Uncle Roy Fowles (Fred L. Fowles, b. 1910, brother of Alberta Fowles Flaherty), taken in Milford, MA 1969

(Ladd Line)

1 Nathaniel Ladd (abt 1596-1632) Witshire, England (link)
2 Daniel Ladd (1613-1693) Haverhill, MA (link)
3 Nathaniel Ladd (1651-1691) mortally wounded in fight with Indians at Maquoit, ME, August 11, 1691
4 John Ladd (b.1689) Exeter, NH
5 Nathaniel Ladd (b.1741) Kingston, NH
6 Benjamin Ladd (b.1753) Deerfield, NH
7 Benjamin Ladd (b.1814) Searsmoint, ME
8 Nancy "Nellie" Ladd (b.1851) married Lewis "Loren" Fowles, July 13, 1876, the same 13 William Loren (Lowring) Fowles (1851-1929) Searsmont, ME listed in the Fowle line above.

(Merrill Line)

1 John Merrell (d.1600) Wherstead, England
2 Nathaniel Merrell (1592-1626) Wherstead, England
3 Nathaniel Merrell (Merrill) (1601-1654), emigrated from Wiltshire, England to America abt 1635, Newbury, MA
4 Daniel Merrill (1642-1717) Salisbury, MA
5 Moses Merrill (1683-1756) Salisbury, MA
6 Daniel Merrill (1723-1809) New Gloucester, ME
7 Joseph Merrill (1744-1786) New Gloucester, ME
8 Elizabeth Merrill Pumpelly (1771-1843) Turner, ME, ma. Bennett Pompilly (Pumpelly), son of John and Appy (Meijers) Pompilly. Revolutionary war note: Bennett Pompilly (1761-1834) enlisted, 1776, when but 15 years of age in Capt. John Turner's company, from Pembroke, MA, which marched to Rhode Island; in 1780 was with General Washington at Camp Totoway, NJ. He was born in Duxbury, MA; died in Turner, ME.
9 John Pumpelly (1880-1882) Brooks, ME
10 Chandler Pilley (1832-1887) Brooks, ME
11 Abby Jane Pilley Fowles (1880-1927) Belfast, ME, ma. 14 Burton Fowles (1881-1958) Belfast, ME, listed in the Fowle lineage above. Abby and Burt's gravestone is pictured above.

Click here for published lineage for this line back to 1444.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Barney was The Man

Barney Dworkin, pictued above with a customer in his Saugus MA shoe store, was the first person that ever brought me to a dog track (Wonderland Park 1967).

Barney Dworkin loved Wonderland Greyhound Park but didn't like to go there by himself. In March 1967 I was working in a shoe store in The New England Shopping Center on Route 1 in Saugus, MA. Barney managed a store a few doors down and we met frequently during each business day. One day he invited me to head over to Wonderland after work. It was the first of many visits for me to greyhound tracks from New Hampshire to Colorado.

But Barney wasn't just a chauffer. He became my mentor and what I used to call my "first Jewish friend". That wasn't a racist remark as much as it was evidence of my upbringing in an Irish/Italian Catholic little town. I admired Barney's business acumen, sense of humor, respect for others and especially his family life. He invited me to his home from dinner with his wife and children as often as he invited me to Wonderland.

I never saw him again after 1967 and don't know what happened to him. Nevertheless, he had a significant impact on my life in a very short period of time.

Barney was a superb greyhound handicapper, although I couldn't know it as a neophyte. It took me years of experience to appreciate how well grounded in the sport I had become as a result of Barney's eagerness to share his knowlege. Following are the lessons that I took in from Barney Dworkin:

1) Barney taught me how to read a racing program. He went over every detail with me and explained the reasons why each piece of information was important (or not).

2) He taught me about box bias in greyhound racing. He explained that the #1 and #8 dogs had an advantage simply because there was only one dog on either side that could bump them. And, since the shortest distance around the track was near the rail, the #1 had the biggest advantage of all. He explained the different distances and how the box bias shifted based on each distance. For the longest distances, box bias obviously had less impact on the race. Barney knew this and wanted to make sure that I understood it also.

3) Barney knew the importance of early speed. He always tried to predict the leader at the first turn and then look for comments like "faded", "caught", "tiring". He would try to visulaize the running of the race in his mind ahead of time.

4) As for posted weights, Barney felt weight was mostly meaninless because the vets would scratch a dog that was significantly above or below its established running weight. However, there were two situations where weight mattered to him. One was "weight losers" and the other was races run in the rain and mud. He kept track of the dogs from week to week and had a list of dogs who ran at lighter weights than their ususal weight in the late races. To him, this meant the dogs might be fidgety in the holding cage at the track and well worn out by race time. He would watch for a known weight loser running in the first or second race and be all over them in the double. I saw him hit a few big tickets that way. As for the bad weather, he just felt the heaviest dogs (over 80 lbs.) could handle the slipping and sliding and bumping in the mud better than the lighter dogs. So he gave the heavy dogs an edge in those conditions.

5) Also regarding rainy conditions, he noted that sometimes puddles formed along the rail. He would look for puddles and toss out the inside dogs when present. He also felt the closers had less of a chance in the mud for the same reasons as in horse racing...the behind runners get mud kicked in their eyes. "There are no goggles in dog racing," he would say.

6) When a dog was scratched, Barney would look closely at the two dogs in the neighboring boxes to the scratched entry. So, for example, if the #3 was scratched, he would look closely at the #2 and #4 and there would have to be a good reason to leave them out of the trifecta. Sometimes, if the odds were right, he would bet on those two dogs in the quiniella as a "spot play".

7) Barney had an interesting angle relating to early speed and the concept behind comment 6 above. He would watch for a flash and fade early speed dog that would likely race to the turn and eventually fall back. He would treat that race as though the speedster's box was empty, figuring that one of the adjacent pups could fire out in the early racer's slip stream and then blow by him when he faded. In other words, it was like a fullback clearing a path for the running back. Or, if you don't like football, think lead-out in a bicycle sprint. I was never quite able to put it that angle into practice, but I did see Barney do it a few times.

8) Barney was not a heavy bettor. That was his self-limiting style of money management. It was also his agreement with his wife, which he honored religiously. He rarely played more than $10 on a single race. He felt that anything can go wrong in one race and that a good handicapper will hit often enough to make a profit. He was strongly negative on betting against yourself so he would play a single quiniella or double, perhaps $2 or $5 on the nose. Occasionally, he would box three dogs in a trifecta.

9) We talked about class, including the grading requirements and the highest class won by each dog. Barney looked for double class droppers but wouldn't bet them until they showed some sign of coming back into form. And, of course, he had his own methods for evaluating a dog's current form. Suprisingly, he didn't pay much attention to average running times because, in his opiniion, there were too many variables that impacted a dog's running time on a aprticular day. And, while he was good at math, he didn't want to spend his handicapping time making math calculations.

10) Finally, Barney felt there were subtle differences during night races as compared to day racing. He felt that anything from shadows to tiredness to eating habits to bad eyesight on the part of some dogs could make a difference in performance and results. Years later I did a lot of research on this subject (day vs. night results at the same track) and found that, as usual, Barney was absolutely correct. I still use this factor in my handicapping.

I know that these are fundamentals to experienced greyhound fans but, for me, I am certainly grateful that I had a good teacher right out of the box.

Barney Dworkin also taught me how to properly trim a shoe store window, but that's another story for another time! May God Bless you Barney, wherever you are. Merry Christmas. I mean, Happy Hanukkah.

This post originally appeared in my greyhound racing blog.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Double Bronze for U.S. Chess Teams

The U.S. Women's Team, Bronze medal winners at the 2008 Chess Olympiad in Dresdan.

Both U.S. Chess teams finshed strong to win bronze medals at the 38th Chess Olympiad completed yesterday in Germany.

In the Open Olympiad, Armenia defended its 2006 title to win the gold with 19 points. Israel was second with 18. The United States won their last round match against Ukraine, despite being outrated on every board, to take bronze on tiebreak over the Ukraine. Both teams finished with 17 points out of 22 in the 11-round tournament.

In the Women's Olympiad, Georgia and Ukraine, both countries from the former Soviet Union, tied for first with 18 points. The team from Georgia took the gold medals on tiebreak (411.5 to 406.5). The U.S. won the tiebreak over Russia and Poland for the bronze. All three teams finished a point back of the leaders with 17 points.

The scoring system this year was based on two points for each match win and one point for a tie. The U.S. Open (Men's) Team was ranked 10th going into the event and the Women's team was ranked 7th.

Members of the U.S. Open Team (8 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses) were Gata Kamsky, Hikaru Nakamura, Alexander Onischuk, Yuri Shulman and Varuzhan Akobian. All five players finished with a winning record. The top three boards each scored 6 1/2 points out of ten games played. Complete results are here.

The U.S. Women's Team consisted of Irina Krush, Anna Zatonskih, Rusa Goletiani, Katerina Rohonyan and Tatev Abrahamyan. Complete results for the U.S. Women's team are here.

Anna Zatonskih won the individual gold medal for her 8/10 performance on Board 2. Rusa Goletiana played all 11 rounds and finished with a 9-2 record to take the silver medal for Board 3.

Thank you to Susan Polgar and Rob Huntington (AP) for their fast updates on the tournament. Please go to Susan Polgar's blog for detailed results and many, many photos of the 38th Chess Olympiad.

Monday, November 24, 2008

U.S. Olympiad Teams in the hunt for Medals


Both U.S. Chess teams remain in the hunt for medals at the 38th chess Olympiad currently underway in Dresden, Germany. Each has 15 points out of 20 after ten of eleven scheduled rounds. The final matches will be contested on Tuesday, November 25th.

The Men's (Open) team trails Armenia and Ukraine by two points while the Women's team is behind Poland by the same margin. A total of 156 teams are competing and 152 countries are represented in the Open event. 119 teams are entered in the Women’s tournament.

Here are the standings in the Open Olympiad:
1st (tie) – Armenia (8W, 1D, 1L) and Ukraine (7W, 3D, 0L), 17 points
3rd (tie) -- China and Israel, 16 points
5th (tie) -- United States, Netherlands, Russia and Spain, 15 points

The U.S. Men's team entered the bi-annual tournament ranked 10th on the basis of average FIDE rating. All five of the players have plus scores for the event:
Gata Kamsky (2729) 5.5/9
Hikaru Nakamura (2704) 6/9
Alexander Onischuk (2644) 5.5/9
Yuri Shulman (2616) 4.5/7
Varuzhan Akobian (2606) 4/6


The key loss was an eighth round defeat 2 1/2 to 1 1/2 at the hands of the team from Russia. They will have their work cut out in the final match against Ukraine, where they will be outrated on all four boards:

USA vs. Ukraine, Round 11
Bd. 1 Kamsky vs. Vassily Ivanchuk (2786)
Bd. 2 Nakamura vs. Sergey Karjakin (2730)
Bd. 3 Onischuk vs. Pavel Eljanov (2720)
Bd. 4 Shulman vs. Zagar Efimenko (2680)


In other final round matches, China will play Armenia, Israel is matched up against Netherlands, and Russia takes on Spain.

Here is a link to the round by round results of the U.S. Men's (Open) Olympiad Team.

Here are the standings in the Women's Olympiad:
1st – Poland (8W, 1D, 1L), 17 points
2nd (tie) – Ukraine, Georgia and Serbia, 16 points
5th (tie) – United States (7W, 1D, 2L) and Russia, 15 points

The U.S. Women's team entered the tournament ranked 7th. Like the men, all of the players have plus scores for the event:
Irina Krush 2452 6.5/9
Anna Zatonskih 2440 7.5/9
Rusudan Goletiani 2359 8/10
Katerina Rohonyan 2334 5/9
Tatev Abrahamyan 2286 1/3


The U.S. women lost their key match to Poland 3-1 in Round 9. They will play France in the final round:
USA vs. France, Round 11
Bd. 1 Krush vs. Marie Sebag (2533)
Bd. 2 Zatonskih vs. Almira Skripchenko (2455)
Bd. 3 Goletiani vs. Sylvia Collas (2352)
Bd. 4 Rohonyan vs. Sophie Milliet (2366)


In the other final round matches, Poland will take on Ukraine, Georgia is slated to play Serbia, and Netherlands goes against Russia.

Here is a link to the round by round results of the U.S. Women's Olympiad Team.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

New Blog on today.com

Dresden, Germany, is the site of the 38th Chess Olympiad Nov 12-25. Go to my new blog (link below) for results.

I have started a daily blog on today.com.

Subsequent note: I wound up transferring most of the posts to this blog.

Thanks,
Frank

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Delilah on Nightline tonight

Delilah will be on Nightline tonight at 11:35 pm to talk about her radio show and promote her new book, "Love Matters".

Here's the link to the ABC website describing tonight's program.

She was recently on Good Morning America and is lobbying to appear on The David Letterman Show in the near future. See what you think...

Delilah's "Stupid Human Trick"

Click on the link above to see something you may not have witnessed before ;)

subsequent note:
Friday, December 12, 2008, 11:58 AM
Delilah was on Good Morning America today. Very nice article and interview!

And finally, this:

Dear Delilah (an actual note from a listener),

My 8 year old daughter and I were on our way home tonight and listening to your show. During your show, you played a Kenny G version of "Little Drummer Boy." I told my daughter that I thought it was crazy to play that song with no drums, only horns and a piano.

She replied, "Instead of calling it 'The Little Drummer Boy,' they should have called it, 'The Little Horny Boy.'"

It took everything out of me to keep a straight face and not laugh. I had to share.

Thanks,

Kay